Shmarnia

Not having read any of the Narnia books, I really had no interest in the movie. Still, for the sake of marital harmony in the Moorishgirl household, I might have agreed to go. That is, until I saw this:

Over the years, others have had uneasy doubts about the Narnian brand of Christianity. Christ should surely be no lion (let alone with the orotund voice of Liam Neeson). He was the lamb, representing the meek of the earth, weak, poor and refusing to fight. Philip Pullman – he of the marvellously secular trilogy His Dark Materials – has called Narnia “one of the most ugly, poisonous things I have ever read”.

Why? Because here in Narnia is the perfect Republican, muscular Christianity for America – that warped, distorted neo-fascist strain that thinks might is proof of right. I once heard the famous preacher Norman Vincent Peel in New York expound a sermon that reassured his wealthy congregation that they were made rich by God because they deserved it. The godly will reap earthly reward because God is on the side of the strong. This appears to be CS Lewis’s view, too. In the battle at the end of the film, visually a great epic treat, the child crusaders are crowned kings and queens for no particular reason. Intellectually, the poor do not inherit Lewis’s earth.

It sounds pretty awful, but I’ll have to reserve judgment until I’m dragged to it this weekend.

Link from Jessa at Bookslut.

Share

Comments are closed.

  • Twitter

  • Category Archives

  • Monthly Archives