You my dear are telling it like it is. Good to see a lady with a brain use it, keep up the good work and continue to expose the PNAC/Bush agenda for what it is. It is quickly unravelling thread-by-thread, and soon the hoods of the current leaders will fall to the ground, the faces unmasked for the nation and the entire world to see.

Chin up, fingers on the keyboard and keep writing my dear.

I think it’s worth taking a brief look at the history of Iraqi-US relations - particularly during previous republican administrations.

Visit

http://www.casi.org.uk/info/usdocs/usiraq80s90s.html

and “find” for the paragraph containing the phrase “non-binding Presidential”. Then ask yourself some questions about what you are told and what you are not told. Also remember that at the outset of the first gulf war we were told that Iraqi soldiers were throwing babies outof incubators in kuwait - this was later exposed as a lie.

Also, before 11th september 2001 is used as justification for the application of the bush doctrine to Iraq it’s worth reading

http://www.newamericancentury.org/iraqclintonletter.htm

In this document the architects of the current action set out their stall a full 3 years before that terrible event.

If we did what we’re doing in Iraq to every single country that is doing something “wrong” we wouldn’t be a super power for very much longer.

Our country looks out for it’s best interests (as any sovereign nation would do), and I’m sad that we weren’t more active in preventing attrocities.

I’m not condoning what the US has done IN THE PAST. Please remember that the same goverment in the US isn’t in power for 50 years at a time like some places so we can’t point to one man and say “it’s all his fault!”

I’m babbling.

Turn off Fox.
Think. It is the whole basis of Democracy.
In the counsels of Government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the Military Industrial Complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes.”
- President Dwight Eisenhower, January 1961.

Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their own government.”
-Thomas Jefferson

The first truth is that the liberty
of a democracy is not safe
if the people tolerate the growth
of private power to a point
where it becomes stronger
than their democratic state
itself.
That, in essence,is fascism
- ownership of government
by an individual,
by a group,
or by any other
controlling power.
Among us today a concentration
of private power without equal in history
is growing.”

-Franklin Delano Roosevelt

The Ra Ra, the knee jerk stuff is to keep us from thinking cuz the powers that be know we love our Country. Standing by America means standing by her values, dissenting when they’re being hijacked.
Think. Our country depends on it.
We are the “Land of the Free”

If enough Muslims weren’t angry at us already, I don’t think it would be in our interest (at this point in time) to start flexing more muscle in dar al Islam.

David,
-While it’s true that “there are many other ways to deliver weapons,” this applies equally well to a host of other countries, like Syria, North Korea, Lybia, etc. As long as there are people willing to die to kill us, we won’t be safe.
-I certainly didn’t suggest that the Kuwaitis would have been better off under Saddam. That’s a leap that you (not I) made. What I was suggesting was that our grand claims of bringing “liberation” to people have not panned out in the past. And one would hope that we would do a better job this time around.

Big John,
-I agree with what you say about war. In fact, my post says “I won’t say that war is wrong.” For example, to the extent that there had been a clear case of aggression against Kuwait, Desert Storm was justified. Same with Kosovo, etc.
-I never said “the only massacre was 15 years ago.” Please read my post again. I was talking about the fact that the Halabja incident is brought up constantly, and I linked to some interesting information about that particular incident. This is not a condonement of Saddam.

Eric & Jeremy,
Er… Okay….

Josh,
-Yes, I posted this entry at 8 am, but I said “Soon.” I didn’t say at 12:08 or 5:07 or anything like that. I wish the bombs don’t rain down on people, but that’s what the much talked about “shock and awe” is about. We all would prefer it wouldn’t happen.
-I misspoke about the Al-Samoud. Yes, they had a range of greater than 93 miles, but not by much (the tests said somewhere around 100 miles.)
-Feel free to make your own predictions about the war if you don’t like mine.
-As for Saddam being a brutal dictator, that’s a fact that needs no elaborating. I was born in a country that has perfected torture, so I could tell you stories just as shocking as the ones you talk about. Yes, Saddam should go, but I’m questioning the timing and the rationale for a war to oust him. You don’t have to agree.
-As for our men and women in uniform, let’s please not play a game of “more patriotic than thou.”

First off, you posted this entry aproximately 12 hours previous to the end mark of the 48 hour deadline President Bush gave Saddam and his thugs to leave Iraq. As you may well know now, the war didn’t start. No one went screaming across the southern borders (though that may very well happen). No bombs have (and I quote) “rained down on Baghdad.” Nor do I believe they will. Our President may be a Cowboy, but he’s not a moron. As you may well know now (6:51AM CT), he ordered a surgical strike via tomahawk and F117 jets on specific and isolated targets in southern Baghdad. I would not call this “raining down,” and neither would anyone else.

Furthermore, you are incorect in your assesment of the Al-Samoud missiles. They SHOULD HAVE a range NO MORE than 93 miles. They HAD a range much greater than that. There is a big difference there.

You make absolutely stunning predictions of the future of our world and the war in Iraq. Are you in fact omniscient?

Here, let me be so blunt and raw that I verge on disgusting. Why don’t you do this. Go to Iraq and take some counts. Try and tally all the little tiny helpless girls that have been fucked until they were dead in front of their parents and siblings… ’till the blood ran down there legs. Tally all the women that had the same treatment. Tally those women who were hung upside down by there ankles while they were menstruating, tally the little boys, men and women who were tortured, raped beaten and then brutaly murdered, and then raped again by Saddam and his thugs. Do you want to vomit now? I should hope so.

Tally THAT. Then come tell me that our President, a man of God, a man of morals, a man of wisdom, a man of integrity, a man of sympathy, a man with dignity and intestinal fortitude is going for the oil, or for his father’s sake or for whatever other damn reason you think he is doing this.

Stop believing what the liberals are trying to shove down your throat.

And as far as the UN is concerned, it deserves nothing more than disregard, though President Bush has been patient for months now. The UN (with the help of the cowardly French) have now displayed they’re weekness for the whole world to see.

And I sure hope that there is a “Pro-US” leader in Iraq after Saddam is gone. Why in the hell would we want an “Anti-US” leader in there? You make some dangerous blanket statements and predictions of the future.

President Bush and all of our boys in the Armed Forces are out there right now, around the world in harms way, and always have been. They are the reason you can write this blog, and say what you feel like saying. Remember that.

We’ll get right on that!